Category Archives: Taxes And Real Estate

Distressed Borrowers Tax Break Expiring


To the dismay of housing advocates, industry groups, and U.S. legislators, a tax break for distressed home owners whose mortgages were written down expired on Tuesday.

The 2007 measure exempted borrowers from federal taxes they normally would owe on assistance received from banks, primarily in the form of short sales and forgiven home loan debt. Although the residential property market is in recovery, housing advocates contend that the tax break put in place after the real estate market crashed is still needed.

More than 6 million U.S. homeowners still owe more on their mortgages than the underlying properties are worth, they say, and failure to renew the tax break would only increase their financial burden.

A report by the Congressional Research Service calculates that a middle-income homeowner who is granted a $20,000 reduction in mortgage debt could expect to owe $5,600 in federal taxes without the tax break.

“It makes absolutely no sense,” says Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich. “This is not just about fairness for homeowners. This is about keeping the housing recovery alive.”

Other policymakers agree, given the broad bipartisan support for an extension of the law. While Congress went on holiday break without taking action, it could revisit the issue as soon as next week, possibly passing a retroactive extension.

Source: “Mortgage Tax Break Expires Despite Bipartisan Support in Congress,” Los Angeles Times (Dec. 31, 2013)

Tax Rules When You Refinance

Recent drops in interest rates have prompted millions of households to refinance their mortgages. Borrowers who refinance need to familiarize themselves with tricky tax rules on what is or isn’t deductible for interest payments. Here are some reminders on how the rules work.

Question: I own a personal residence. It’s worth more than the remaining principal balance on the mortgage. My lender is willing to allow me to refinance for more than the balance of the existing mortgage. I know that the tax rules allow me to deduct interest payments on a refinancing loan as long as it’s for the same amount as the existing balance. But am I also entitled to deduct interest payments for the part of the refinancing that exceeds the existing balance? And does it matter that I plan to use most of the excess refinancing proceeds to pay off credit card debts?

Answer: Whether borrowers are entitled to deduct interest on the excess amount depends upon how they use the proceeds from the refinancing and the amount of the proceeds. When borrowers use the amount in excess of the existing mortgage to buy, build or substantially improve principal residences, meaning year-round dwellings, or second homes such as vacation retreats, their interest payments come under the rules for home acquisition loans. Those rules allow them to deduct the entire interest as long as the excess plus all other home acquisition loans don’t exceed $1,000,000, dropping to $500,000 for married couples filing separate returns.

When borrowers use the excess for any other purposes, another set of rules prohibits deductions for payments of interest on “consumer loans.” This wide-ranging category includes credit card bills, auto loans, medical expenses and other personal debts such as overdue federal and state income taxes. There is, though, a limited exception for interest on student loans, one of those “above-the-line” subtractions to arrive at adjusted gross income, the amount on the last line of the first page of the 1040 form.

But most borrowers are able to sidestep these restrictions on deductions for consumer interest, thanks to the rules for home equity loans. Those rules allow them to deduct the entire interest as long as the amount in excess of the existing mortgage plus all other home equity loans don’t exceed $100,000, dropping to $50,000 for married couples filing separate returns. It makes no difference how borrowers use the proceeds.

When their refinanced loans are partly home acquisition loans and partly home equity loans, there’s an overall limit of $1,100,000, which is a combination of $1,000,000 from the home acquisition debt and $100,000 home equity debt. That number drops to $550,000 for married couples filing separately. When the loans exceed the ceiling of $1,000,000 for home acquisition loans and $100,000 for home equity loans, the excess generally is categorized as nondeductible personal interest. The general disallowance is subject to exceptions for loan proceeds used for business or investment purposes.

Yet another restriction applies to the steadily growing number of borrowers burdened by the AMT, the alternative minimum tax. The AMT allows deductions for interest payments on home acquisition loans of up to $1,000,000 ($500,000 for married couples filing separately). But AMT rules deny any deductions for interest on home equity loans for first or second homes, unless the loan proceeds are used to buy, build, or substantially improve the dwellings.

Julian Block is an attorney and author based in Larchmont, N.Y. He has been cited as: “a leading tax professional” (New York Times); “an accomplished writer on taxes” (Wall Street Journal); and “an authority on tax planning” (Financial Planning Magazine). This article is excerpted from Julian Block’s Year Round Tax Savings, available at